jmkni an hour ago

There is something fascinating about people from history who had an idea to do something which is now just normal, but the technology just wasn't there (and people probably thought they were mad).

I guess that's why I enjoy reading Hacker News comments

fracus 2 hours ago

He basically just glued two TVs together. You would get more usability if you just bought two separate TVs.

  • bryanlarsen an hour ago

    The prototype was two TV's together. The final product was much more interesting.

seeknotfind 2 hours ago

Occasionally I put on multiple programs. Movies in one room, an audio book in another, music in another, etc. Your mind drifts to what is interesting. Lights strobing. Working on 5 different home projects in parallel. It's a vibe.

arlia a day ago

This seems to be from the '50s, not the '40s.

  • pseudolus a day ago

    The photo shown at the top of the story is of a 1945 prototype.

    • hn_throwaway_99 4 hours ago

      You're both right. The initial prototype with essentially 2 separate side-by-side TVs was from 1945. But the more interesting (IMO) approach was the 1954 "Duoscopic" version that showed 2 programs on the same screen, and each viewer looked through a polarized panel (and had their own headphones) to view their particular program: https://www.earlytelevision.org/pdf/dumont_duoscopic_brochur...

      • SoftTalker 4 hours ago

        It could probably have shown 3D programs as well, using glasses with differently polarized right and left lenses.